as of right now my presentation is not ready, and I received a extension. But that does not change what I have already done. so at first I chose to go with making a power point presentation. This is most likely due to the fact that im most comfortable with this format of presentation. But the main purpose from my research paper to my power point did not change. For both I wanted to expose the Pharmaceutical industry, and really point out the blatant facts that clear should make American worry. The whole purpose of this project was to be able to transfer the ideas that you had on paper, into a clear understanding of the same topic only on a multimedia related document. I believe that I did that pretty well.
I would have to say that my target audience was continuous and the same for both of the different types of media. There was no reason for me to try to change the audience or group of people I was trying to reach, because it was simply the American public. The whole idea I had was to be able to inform the public about the truth of these big pharma companies. But there were many aspects that also changed for the multimedia project like color and voice over.
The major differences between the two written and non written pieces I woukld say pertains to what I meantioned above with color and voice over. I had to add coloer inorder to make things pop and catch the readers eye. Then came the pictures and voice over which were ver different. The most challenging part would be the voice over, and not reading to fast or to slow and not leaving any important info out. but over all it was an easier assignment.
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
multimedia
For the nest assignment I seem to be leaning towards using the media of a powerpoint. First off i think that a power point would be the simplest way to transfer the lengthy paper, with in relation less work. with a powerpoint i feel as if i can put just the main details or aspects of my paper, with kind of broad point. I say this because that would give me the ability to elaborate on the subject rather then just reading words i put up. In my eyes if i simply read from a screen i would probably bore the class to death.
Then throughout the power point i would first incorporate picture in order to make the subject more interesting to the people around you. I know if someone else were to do a powerpoint and the only thing i saw on the slides were words, there is a good chance i could fall asleep. after the picture i would add color to the slides so it would be more appealing to the eye. Then last i could incorporate sound effects that could enhance/play with the emotion of the audience.
Then throughout the power point i would first incorporate picture in order to make the subject more interesting to the people around you. I know if someone else were to do a powerpoint and the only thing i saw on the slides were words, there is a good chance i could fall asleep. after the picture i would add color to the slides so it would be more appealing to the eye. Then last i could incorporate sound effects that could enhance/play with the emotion of the audience.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
for the nest assignment I would miost likely decide on a power point, and this is for many reasons. first It would be a little bit less work considering I could be able to condense information and put the main points. Also It would give more of a visual appeal, and seem less boring. I would try to incorporate graphs with data so the fact are easily understood. having a powerpoint would make make my information neat as well along with giving me another way to evaluate the info I found.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
review after final draft of research paper.
This paper is different from the first one because of the overall goal. For the first paper we had to interview people from our field of study, and elaborate and dissect the type of writing preformed by individuals in this field. we had to elaborate people in our desired field and use there interviews as a guide or basis to explain the type of writing used in their field. then for this paper we were preforming research to support our position on a view, and I picked the corruption in the pharmaceutical industry. I had to find sources that supported my view along with addressing and adhearing to an opposing view as well. this paper required a lot more work in my opinion, but at the same time it educated me on more things I was unaware of. This paper ultimately had us giving facts for colid support on our position. In our first paper I feel like I possessed a lot more knowdge regarding the topic prior to actually writing and interviewing.
If you look at the movement from rough draft to final draft I hope you are able to see some improvements. I fixed grammatical errors along with trying to add some more supporting information, I used the tips that were presented by Mr.Paudel. I added another source that supported my view but I needed one that supported the opposite view. I couldn't find a reliable source pertaining to the opposing view of my argument, so I used a source that supported mine but contrasted and made it clear to why an opposing view could be seen. also I tried adding in a clearer thesis and hopefully it will help. But for my first draft I would say that I used an outline because I did create one, except for the fact that I changed my topic the very last second. So in reality I threw my outline out the window and I just went with flow. I good some topics and I ended up deciding on the corrupted pharma industry. from there I started researching and tried narrow down the most relevant evidence or points that will support my view. Once I found the main ideas and support I would use throughout my paper I began to write.
If you look at the movement from rough draft to final draft I hope you are able to see some improvements. I fixed grammatical errors along with trying to add some more supporting information, I used the tips that were presented by Mr.Paudel. I added another source that supported my view but I needed one that supported the opposite view. I couldn't find a reliable source pertaining to the opposing view of my argument, so I used a source that supported mine but contrasted and made it clear to why an opposing view could be seen. also I tried adding in a clearer thesis and hopefully it will help. But for my first draft I would say that I used an outline because I did create one, except for the fact that I changed my topic the very last second. So in reality I threw my outline out the window and I just went with flow. I good some topics and I ended up deciding on the corrupted pharma industry. from there I started researching and tried narrow down the most relevant evidence or points that will support my view. Once I found the main ideas and support I would use throughout my paper I began to write.
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
outline
intro:
Curing disease:
- need a hook statement
- state view on how i believe that stem cells virtually hold an endless amount of opputunity in the medical field that will lead to amazing already anticipated breakthroughs.
Curing disease:
- can cure many diseases of all sorts.
- can cure abnormalities/Birth defects.
- can cure spinal cord injuries
- reduced risk of transplantation procedures.
- simply making an individuals life better or a families.
- try to use emotion, to show side.
opposing view:
- you shouldn't mess with human life.
- humans shouldn't try to play god.
- research methods used concerning nuclear research.
Conclusion:
- tie together everything and try to use emotional appeal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)